AI Camera Controversy in Western Australia
In October 2025, Western Australia introduced AI-enabled road safety cameras designed to detect seatbelt violations, speeding, and cellphone use while driving. The cameras were intended to improve road safety by issuing fines for safety rule violations, including seatbelt non-compliance. However, the system has faced significant criticism from residents, particularly over penalties related to seatbelt violations.
Many argue that the AI cameras fine drivers even when seatbelts are momentarily adjusted or displaced, such as when children shift in their seats—a common occurrence. Some individuals, particularly neurodivergent passengers, have also raised concerns about receiving fines for unintentional seatbelt movement, making them feel unfairly targeted.
Impact on Individuals
Several personal stories have drawn attention to the system’s flaws. Elli Figomnari, a disability support worker, shared that she has received four fines since the implementation of the AI cameras, putting her at risk of losing her driver’s license. Her situation has sparked outrage, as many feel the fines penalize minor and unintentional actions.
In another case, Ross Taylor, a grandfather, shared his frustration after his daughter received a $385 fine for her young child briefly having their seatbelt improperly worn. Taylor, like many others, feels the fines issued by the cameras are disproportionate to the behavior they’re meant to address.
Rising Number of Fines
Since the implementation of the AI cameras, Western Australia has issued around 36,000 seatbelt infringement notices, with many residents voicing their frustration about the system. The widespread nature of these fines has led to growing concerns that the penalties are too harsh and not appropriately tailored to specific situations.
Government’s Response and Review
In response to the backlash, Transport Minister Rita Saffioti acknowledged that the system allows residents to appeal fines in “exceptional circumstances.” However, this has done little to quell the criticism from those who believe the system is unfair.
Road Safety Commissioner Adrian Warner also addressed the concerns, noting that while the AI system was designed to improve road safety, it may require improvements to ensure fairness. Warner pointed out that police officers currently have the discretion to issue or withhold fines based on individual circumstances—something the AI cameras cannot do.
In light of these issues, the Road Safety Commission has announced a review of the penalty process to ensure that fines are issued in a fair and proportional manner. This review aims to address concerns that the system may be too rigid and needs to take real-world nuances into account.
